--Barry
Joe Conway wrote:
Second case of bad markup today. Someone from the jdbc camp might want to look at this, but I took a shot at fixing it so I could keep working on my own doc updates.
Joe
p.s. Just a friendly reminder ;-)
cd doc/src/sgml make check
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index: doc/src/sgml/jdbc.sgml =================================================================== RCS file: /opt/src/cvs/pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml/jdbc.sgml,v retrieving revision 1.46 diff -c -r1.46 jdbc.sgml *** doc/src/sgml/jdbc.sgml 6 Aug 2003 23:50:19 -0000 1.46 --- doc/src/sgml/jdbc.sgml 7 Aug 2003 03:57:02 -0000 *************** *** 365,371 **** ! By default the driver collects all the results for the --- 365,371 ---- ! By default the driver collects all the results for the *************** *** 407,413 **** st.close(); ! --- 407,414 ---- st.close(); ! ! *************** *** 607,613 **** When calling a function that returns a refcursor you must cast the return type ! of getObject to a ResultSet --- 608,614 ---- When calling a function that returns a refcursor you must cast the return type ! of getObject to a ResultSet
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
