Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane writes: >> I don't really care for using that name for it ---
> iso8601 > Keep in mind that SQL itself is also a kind of ISO, so being more specific > is useful. Yes, but by the same token "iso8601" isn't specific enough either. Several of the other input formats we support have at least as good a claim on that name. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org