Gaetano Mendola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why instead of reinvent the whell not use, or at least do a "C" port of > stl::list ?
Because (a) implementing a linked list is pretty trivial (b) the only difficult part is getting the semantics / API right. I don't see how std::list would help with (b), and (a) negates the benefit of importing the code from elsewhere. We'd also have to gut std::list, since we wouldn't be able to make use of C++ templates. That said, if you know of any specific techniques from std::list implementations that would be useful, please let me know. > PS: My 2 cents: I don't like too much have the lenght inside the list > struct. Why not? -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html