Bruce, > This seems like a valuable feature, as others have mentioned. However, > should it also prevent changes to default_transaction_read_only? > > What is the use case for this functionality?
I thought that this was rejected thouroughly by Tom some months ago. He argued pretty strongly that READ ONLY transactions were *not* a security feature and that trying to make them one would work very poorly. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
