On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 05:19:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Thomas Baden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi there. My install was failing the regression tests > > due to a shared memory error. > > After reviewing the proposed patch, I find it hard to believe that the > patch would have fixed any such problem --- even if key_t is 64 bits > on your system, the code should still have worked, because we'd never > have selected a key value wider than 32 bits anyway. What *exact* > misbehavior were you seeing?
It's not the key (key_t) that is the problem, but the size, which used to be int but got replaced by a size_t. Kurt ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
