Manfred Spraul wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >> > >>+ /* > >>+ * We could lose a signal during this test. > >>+ * In a multi-threaded application, this might > >>+ * be a problem. Do any non-threaded platforms > >> > Threaded or non-threaded?
OK, yea, I will use threaded. > >>+ * lack sigaction()? > >>+ */ > >> > Additionally, the problem is not restricted to multithreaded apps: > signal(,SIG_IGN) clears all pending signals. Oh, yuck. Would SIG_DFL be better here? I am thinking of adding sigblock into that code on the assumption that if they have signal(), they have sigblock(). Should we disable threaded builds unless they have sigaction()? I suppose the sigblock() would take care of the pending signal problem too. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
