Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ouch. How long has that documentation been wrong? We have pointed
> > folks to that section of the docs tons of times, and no one mentioned
> > that "logrotate" is really "rotatelogs", and that it is missing
> > parameters?
>
> > I have applied the following patch to document rotatelogs properly.
>
> I think you just broke it. logrotate and rotatelogs are two different
> programs, and AFAIK the existing documentation correctly described the
> one that is easier to use with Postgres.
Oh, why don't I have logrotate. My system has:
rotatelogs - rotate Apache logs without having to kill the
server
rotatelogs logfile rotationtime [offset]
and it says it is Apache's. I must be wrong but can someone explain
this?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
