Would you show an example of the invalid value this is trying to avoid?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stephen Frost wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
>   The attached patch adds some error-checking to the timestamp_recv
>   function so that it's not possible to put an invalid timestamp into a
>   timestamp column (hopefully).  The check is done in basically the
>   exact same way the out-of-bounds check in timestamp2tm is done.
>   There's probably an easier/cleaner way but this should work or at
>   least generate discussion and a better patch. :)
> 
>       Thanks,
> 
>               Stephen

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
>                http://archives.postgresql.org

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Reply via email to