Gavin Sherry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> I vote for taking it out.
> Pull it. I added it intentionally but now I'm questioning my reasoning
> (which was, sequences might be accessed lots, people might want to put
> them somewhere intentionally).
I thought about that, but AFAICS a heavily used sequence would merely
end up as a single hot entry in the shared buffer arena (or at worst,
an often-hit page in kernel buffers). It could not result in a lot of
actual I/O because it's only one page; at most one would expect one
write per checkpoint cycle. So putting it on particularly fast disk
would be a useless exercise.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
