Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, they are talking about the localtime return value,
> but nevertheless the newlib folks refer to that. Their fault.
> Should I discuss that with them?
Probably. They have a gratuitous variation from the Single Unix Spec.
>> But what may be more to the point is that AFAICS we make no assumption
>> about the exact datatype of the timezone variable.
> Bruce' patch only assumes time_t on CYGWIN and it is only for pgtypeslib
> (src/interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/dt.h). Not for src/timezone/pgtz.c
Per my recent post in pghackers, I think that the datatype has nothing
to do with it anyway. The real problem is the loss of this code that
was in pg_config_manual.h in 7.4 and before:
/*
* Define this if your operating system has _timezone rather than timezone
*/
#if defined(__CYGWIN__) || defined(WIN32)
#define HAVE_INT_TIMEZONE /* has int _timezone */
#define HAVE_UNDERSCORE_TIMEZONE 1
#endif
I'm inclined to just put it back, rather than adding a configure test
that we never needed before.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
