On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 04:46, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > I've attached a revised patch which fixes the problem, however I'm sure > > there > > is a better way. Thanks to Neil for putting up with me on irc :-) > > How about calling the savepoint pg_psql_savepoint instead, that way it > follows our 'don't begin things with pg_' philosophy. >
I was actually thinking of calling it something like pg_<xact-start-time> thinking that would be pretty unique within a transaction, though having a specific documented name seemed ok too. Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]