Patch applied. Thanks.
I renamed aggregate_relation_size() to total_relation_size(). To me
'aggregate' was too closely associated with 'aggregates'. If you have
improved wording please let me know.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ed L. wrote:
> On Thursday February 3 2005 9:23, Ed L. wrote:
> > Neil, do you have a verdict on this patch?
> >
> > On Friday January 28 2005 10:30, Ed L. wrote:
> > > If the C code for the prior dbsize patch is not acceptable
> > > for whatever reason, here's a SQL-based patch to replace it.
>
> I submitted a dbsize patch on Jan 25, revised it twice per
> concerns raised by Michael Paesold and Neil Conway ("indexes"
> instead of "indices") and Andreas Pflug and Tom Lane (implement
> in SQL instead of C) and resubmitted Jan 28. I've not received
> any further communication regarding the patch. Please advise if
> there are concerns. I've attached the patch again, slightly
> cleaned up, in case it has fallen through the cracks.
>
> Ed
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
