Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:03 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> My guess is that the FILLFACTOR will actually be a GUC variable rather > >> than a clause to CREATE INDEX or REINDEX or CLUSTER. > > > I hope not, but it would be easier to set like that and a lot easier to > > code up that way. > > I don't like that either. It seems highly unlikely that every table in > a database would need the same fillfactor. It should be a per-table > attribute, maybe with a DB-wide default, much like we handle per-column > statistics targets.
That is fine. I just don't want to add the FILLFACTOR clause to several commands. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
