Certainly seems that way. Missed a .diff for the rules output there... Should be a simple replace, from what I can tell what's in the output on the buildfarm boxes I checked is correct, the expected file shuold changed.
Oops. //Magnus > > Is this what broke the regression tests on HEAD? > > cheers > > andrew > > Neil Conway wrote: > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > >> If the stats collector gets sufficiently backed up, you will lose > >> messages. [...] Please do not try to make piecemeal > changes in that > >> basic design decision. > > > > > > Fair enough. > > > > > (Actually, we could skinny it down to backend PID only ... > > > >> but that would add a hashtable lookup to every message > reception in > >> the stats collector, instead of just indexing into a > BackendId array, > >> so it'd probably be a net loss.) > > > > > > Yeah, I agree -- backend ID and database ID isn't too bad. > > > > I've applied Magnus patch and bumped the catalog version. > I'll take a > > look at reorganizing the statistics collector so that the message > > header is smaller shortly. > > > > - > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
