Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > a_ogawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It is a reasonable idea. However, the majority part of MemSet was not > > able to be avoided by this idea. Because the per-tuple contexts are used > > at the early stage of executor. > > Drat. Well, what about changing that? We could introduce additional > contexts or change the startup behavior so that the ones that are > frequently reset don't have any data in them unless you are working > with pass-by-ref values inside the inner loop. That might be possible. However, I think that we should change only aset.c about this article. I thought further: We can check whether context was used from the last reset even when blocks list is not empty. Please see attached patch. The effect of the patch that I measured is as follows: o Execution time that executed the SQL ten times. (1)Linux(CPU: Pentium III, Compiler option: -O2) - original: 24.960s - patched : 23.114s (2)Linux(CPU: Pentium 4, Compiler option: -O2) - original: 8.730s - patched : 7.962s (3)Solaris(CPU: Ultra SPARC III, Compiler option: -O2) - original: 37.0s - patched : 33.7s regards, --- Atsushi Ogawa
aset.c.patch
Description: Binary data
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
