Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not against the idea of a config variable, but this is what, the
> third or fourth go around on this? It seems rather unfair to put this
> burden upon the current patch writer at this stage of the game...
The fact that objections keep being raised should suggest to you that
the idea is not uncontroversial. I think it's necessary to look for a
compromise that everyone can live with. You're really wasting your
breath to repeat the same arguments over and over and expect that
anyone's mind will change.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
