Tom Lane wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > The attached zip file (os2port.zip) contains an os2.diff file that has all > > the patches for the os/2 port and a file os2newfiles.zip file that has the > > additional files required for the port. > > [ 130k diff snipped ] > > We were willing to tolerate a port this invasive for Windows, but it's > real hard to justify adding so much cruft for OS/2.
I agree with Tom on this. The patch is 4k context diff, and the new files are 30k. It just seems too large for a port we are unlikely going to be able to test or maintain. I think it is like the Netware port where we rely out port-specific folks to maintain a patch. We can mention the patch URL in the FAQ, and already have an OS/2 link there. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
