On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 07:00:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom, please let me know if you want to hack on it, if that's the case > > I'll stop my cleanup and start to work on supporting the things that > > need further coding, which are AFAICS MultiXactId, large objects and > > notifies. > > Well, I am just finishing up the multixact XLOG rewrite, so I was about > to pester you as to where you are on this. > > I would like to start doing something with it --- how can we best avoid > stepping on each others' toes?
Please use the patch I posted yesterday as starting point -- I'll work on missing features. Just don't touch notify.c nor large object support files... I reworked the iterator routines for procarray.c and disaster ensued -- but I'm not sure if that uncovered previous bugs or just introduced some semantic change I'm not seeing. If you rewrite the whole stuff my changes will prove useless, but I don't want to slow you down if it's a bug of mine. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>) "Those who use electric razors are infidels destined to burn in hell while we drink from rivers of beer, download free vids and mingle with naked well shaved babes." (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=44793&cid=4647152) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
