On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 01:14:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Aside from minor problems like being broken and undocumented, there is a > more serious question here: is this even the functionality we want?
I'd rather see something akin to PL/pgSQL's RETURN NEXT or PL/Perl's return_next. -- Michael Fuhr http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
