Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Right; my interpretation is that the "sequence point before function 
> call" rule applies recursively. So in c(a(...), b(...)), there are in 
> fact three sequence points, which precede the calls of a, b, and c. 
> Shouldn't that be sufficient to ensure that the evaluation of 
> libpq_gettext() is not interleaved with the evaluation of the other 
> arguments to the printf()?

I think this is all irrelevant language-lawyering; jtv spotted the true
problem which is that we do not protect errno during the *first* call of
libpq_gettext.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to