Tom Lane wrote:
However I'm a bit dubious about whether "has_role" isn't an invasion of
application namespace. pg_has_role would be better, but we have the
(mis) precedent of has_table_privilege. What do you think about calling
it "has_role_privilege"?
Do we need to follow a bad precedent for the sake of consistency? If
forced to choose, in general I would prefer to sacrifice consistency.
cheers
andrew (old Emersonian)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
