Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> - Xid-wraparound VACUUM is now FULL without ANALYZE >> >> Am I right in my assumption that this VACUUM FULL can happen for any >> database, not just a template database?
> Ah, right. I think it would be OK if we made it FULL only for > datallowcon=false databases. OTOH maybe it's not worth at all making > the distinction and we should continue using the previous policy of > issuing only non-FULL VACUUM. Strikes me as a waste of cycles: the one database *least* likely to be in need of a VACUUM FULL is template0. What we perhaps should consider is VACUUM FREEZE, not FULL, when hitting a template database --- this would maximize the interval before needing to do it again. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org