Matt Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> I can attach a patch that supports [EXACT | NOEXACT]. >> >> Somehow, proposing two new reserved words instead of one doesn't seem >> very responsive to my gripe :-(.
> My intention was to introduce the idea that the current behavior should > be changed, and to then suggest a path that eventually eliminates all > the new reserved words. Once you put 'em in, you can't ever really get rid of 'em :-( ... so I'd prefer to investigate a path that doesn't use that syntax in the first place. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match