Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > OK, here is a version that errors out that I just applied and reversed
> > out when I saw your email.  Feel free to use it or discard it.
> 
> Sorry about that --- should have tried to mail you a bit sooner.
> 
> BTW, what's with the postmaster.c change?  Seems mistaken.

Actually, it is a cleanup.  The original path.c::get_progname() used an
exit() call in WIN32 because it didn't have frontend/backend-specific
code.  With specific versions, I could return a NULL from get_progname
and print a relivant message in postmaster.c on failure.  I doubt it
would ever happen, but it was a cleanup.  It isn't significant enough to
justify making a server-specific version of path.c on its own, however.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

Reply via email to