On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 09:01:45AM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote: > If no statements have been executed in this transaction then committed > is true, so ECPGtrans() ignores the current statement. It looks > like the code should make an extra consideration for SAVEPOINT in > case it's the first statement.
I rearranged the whole code as it seemed to have more holes. This code really was old. :-) So could you please check with the lates CVS, either HEAD or 8.0? > I'm also wondering if the check for a NULL return value from PQexec() > is sufficient. Shouldn't it also check for a non-NULL result that's > anything other than PGRES_COMMAND_OK? Yes, it should. I changed this as well. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq