On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 09:01:45AM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> If no statements have been executed in this transaction then committed
> is true, so ECPGtrans() ignores the current statement. It looks
> like the code should make an extra consideration for SAVEPOINT in
> case it's the first statement.
I rearranged the whole code as it seemed to have more holes. This code
really was old. :-)
So could you please check with the lates CVS, either HEAD or 8.0?
> I'm also wondering if the check for a NULL return value from PQexec()
> is sufficient. Shouldn't it also check for a non-NULL result that's
> anything other than PGRES_COMMAND_OK?
Yes, it should. I changed this as well.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
