On Thu, 2005-13-10 at 00:39 -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> *** doc/src/sgml/cvs.sgml       11 Aug 2005 13:52:33 -0000      1.34
> --- doc/src/sgml/cvs.sgml       13 Oct 2005 06:15:38 -0000
> ***************
> *** 849,855 ****
>   to you the malloc code and an additional installation e-mail from
> John.
>   
>   The Modula-3 installation takes a good bit of room (~50MB?) and the
> ! build environment is unique to Modula-3, but suprisingly enough it
>   pretty much works.
>   
>   The cvsup Makefiles do not work on my machine (they are not portable
> --- 849,855 ----
>   to you the malloc code and an additional installation e-mail from
> John.
>   
>   The Modula-3 installation takes a good bit of room (~50MB?) and the
> ! build environment is unique to Modula-3, but surprisingly enough it
>   pretty much works.
>   
>   The cvsup Makefiles do not work on my machine (they are not
> portable 

This change modifies an SGML comment that contains the text of an email
thread, so it is debatable whether we should be modifying it. However,
is there a good reason for this comment to be in cvs.sgml to begin with?

I agree we should pick American or British spelling and use one
consistently. Barring any objections, I'll apply the rest of the patch
within a day or two.

-Neil



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to