On Thu, 2005-13-10 at 00:39 -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote: > *** doc/src/sgml/cvs.sgml 11 Aug 2005 13:52:33 -0000 1.34 > --- doc/src/sgml/cvs.sgml 13 Oct 2005 06:15:38 -0000 > *************** > *** 849,855 **** > to you the malloc code and an additional installation e-mail from > John. > > The Modula-3 installation takes a good bit of room (~50MB?) and the > ! build environment is unique to Modula-3, but suprisingly enough it > pretty much works. > > The cvsup Makefiles do not work on my machine (they are not portable > --- 849,855 ---- > to you the malloc code and an additional installation e-mail from > John. > > The Modula-3 installation takes a good bit of room (~50MB?) and the > ! build environment is unique to Modula-3, but surprisingly enough it > pretty much works. > > The cvsup Makefiles do not work on my machine (they are not > portable
This change modifies an SGML comment that contains the text of an email thread, so it is debatable whether we should be modifying it. However, is there a good reason for this comment to be in cvs.sgml to begin with? I agree we should pick American or British spelling and use one consistently. Barring any objections, I'll apply the rest of the patch within a day or two. -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org