Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I found the cause. I traced into printf then realized I was not in libc
> > but port/snprintf.c, and I see 4096 defined for those buffers.
>
> Uh, how is control getting to snprintf? I don't see that used either
> in numeric.c or in printtup.c.
I am seeing it in the standalone backend here:
debugtup (slot=0x856e0b0, self=0x84306d0) at printtup.c:548
548 printatt((unsigned) i + 1, typeinfo->attrs[i],
value);
(gdb) s
printatt (attributeId=1, attributeP=0x856efa4, value=0x857201c "1", '0'
<repeats 199 times>...) at printtup.c:480
480 printf("\t%2d: %s%s%s%s\t(typeid = %u, len = %d, typmod
= %d, byval = %c)\n",
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
