On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > > Why is this a good idea? >
"In spirit of incremental improvement": (1) The spinlock itself are light weight than the LWLock here and we can reduce the lock contention a little bit in AbsorbFsyncRequests(); (2) Don't need the CRITICAL SECTION in AbsorbFsyncRequests() any more; Regards, Qingqing ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings