Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > FWIW, Red Hat's legal department thinks that the FSF has "overreached" > > in claiming that the GPL is incompatible with OpenSSL's license. Which > > is why Red Hat isn't worrying about GPL apps that use OpenSSL, of which > > there are quite a few ... > > > > > I'm quite happy if we hang onto Red Hat's coat tails on this one. > > Do we use any GPL libraries other than libreadline? It would be nice to > be able to get out of this game altogether - getting libedit up to > scratch and portable would be very nice, and I know for a fact that > commercial postgres vendors would welcome such a development.
Agreed, but FYI GnuTLS is LGPL, not GPL. -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
