"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 'k, isn't the Reply-To header part of an RFC somewhere? Or is it really an > optional thing for an MUA to follow?
The relevant RFC would be 2822. If mailers have started ignoring reply-to it would be *because* of lists that set it. In the presence of such lists a mailer what's a mailer supposed to do when you ask it to send a personal response to the author? How can it figure out whether the list has done something wacky with the reply-to header or if it's set as intended to the original author's desired contact point? -- greg ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org