Tom Lane wrote:
ISTM that this should be represented using an RTE_SUBQUERY node in the
outer query; the alias attaches to that node, not to the VALUES itself.
So I don't think you need that alias field in the jointree entry either.
If we stick with the plan of representing VALUES as if it were SELECT *
FROM (valuesnode), then this approach would make the second query above
have a structure like
Query
.rtable -> RTE_SUBQUERY
.subquery -> Query
.jointree -> Values
(leaving out a ton of detail of course, but those are the key nodes).
OK, I'll go try to wrap my mind around that this evening and see where
it takes me.
Thanks,
Joe
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
