Oliver Jowett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A 50-parameter query could be .. interesting ..
> I realize that you need this level of output to reflect what is
> happening at the protocol level, but seeing all the protocol detail is
> not really what you expect when you turn on basic statement logging, is it?
Well, we've certainly been beat up often enough about the lack of
logging bind parameter values --- I don't think there's any question
about the importance of printing them. I agree that the proposed format
is much too verbose though. In particular, a separate LOG message per
parameter is NOT what I had in mind; I want them in DETAIL lines of the
bind log message. (This'd perhaps also address Oliver's issue, since
if you didn't want to see the values you could turn down
log_error_verbosity.)
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
