Jonah H. Harris wrote: > > Y'know I was gonna check up on that because my recollection was that it was > > a 2/2 split as well, though I thought that was of people who made their > > view clear rather than just -core (whose opinion in this case is no more > > important than any of the other long time contributors imho). Don't suppose > > you noted the views of the other 6? > > As counted, regarding inclusion in /contrib the thread sits at 5 for, > 4 against, and 1 seems to lean toward making it a contrib. > > Just in case my counting is wrong, this is what I've marked: > > Tzahi Fadida - For > Bruce Momjian - Against > AgentM - Possibly For > Tom Lane - Against > Jonah Harris - For > David Fetter - For > Josh Drake - Against > Andrew Dunstan - Against > Josh Berkus - For > Dave Page - For
I didn't realize the vote was even close for acceptance. I only remember Josh saying he would use it. Saying we should have it to remain "cutting-edge" doesn't strike me as a valid reason for inclusion, but more of a philosophical one, which worries me. I would like it added because people want its functionality, not because it is somehow cool. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
