Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote: > Alvaro Herrera írta: > >Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote: > > > > > >>>I think at this point is someone else's judgement whether you can put it > >>>back or not. Tom already said that he doesn't object to the feature per > >>>se; no one else seems opposed to the feature per se, in fact. > >>> > >>>Now, I don't really see _how_ to do it in nice code, so no, I don't have > >>>any suggestion for you. You may want to give the pumpkin to Tom so that > >>>he gives the patch the finishing touches (hopefully making it support > >>>the "COPY view" feature as well). > >>> > >>>If it were up to me, I'd just commit it as is (feature-wise -- more > >>>thorough review is still needed) and revisit the COPY view stuff in 8.3 > >>>if there is demand. > >>> > >>OK, I will put it back as it was in v8 > >>keeping all your other cleanup and > >>let Bruce and Tom decide. > > > >Hum, are you going to put back the original cruft to support copy view? > >I suggest you don't do that. > > Well, the other way around is to teach heap_open() > to use views. Brrr. Would it be any cleaner?
Certainly not. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
