Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is this something people are interested in? I am thinking no based on > the lack of requests and the size of the patch.
Lack of requests? I was actually surprised by how enthusiastically people reacted to it. However I don't think the patch as is is ready to be committed. Aside from missing documentation and regression tests it was only intended to be a proof-of-concept and to be useful for specific tests I was doing. I did try to do a decent job, I got \timing and server-tracked variables like encoding. But I need to go back through the code and make sure there are no other details like that. It would be nice to get feedback from other developers from looking at the patch to confirm that there aren't more fundamental problems with the approach and how it uses libpq before I go through the effort of cleaning up the details. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
