"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch allows using any row expression in return statement and does
> transformation from untyped row to composite types if it's necessary.
This patch doesn't seem to cope with cases where the supplied tuple has
the wrong number of columns, and it doesn't look like it's being careful
about dropped columns either. Also, that's a mighty bizarre-looking
choice of cache memory context in coerce_to_tuple ... but then again,
why are you bothering with a cache at all for temporary arrays?
I am sorry, Tom. But I don't understand. I can check number of columns,
ofcourse and I'll do it. What cache for temporary arrays do you mean?
Best regards
Pavel Stehule
_________________________________________________________________
Emotikony a pozadi programu MSN Messenger ozivi vasi konverzaci.
http://messenger.msn.cz/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
