Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > >>> Attached patch adds a version check for bison when running the
> > vc++
> > >>> build.
> > >>
> > >> Shouldn't it be looking for 2.1 as well?
> > 
> > > 2.1 is the broken one.
> > 
> > Exactly.  So we should reject it.
> 
> We do. The code as-is *only* accepts 1.875. Thus it rejects 2.1.

I think Tom's point is that we should reject only 2.1.  Isn't that the
only version that fails?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

Reply via email to