Magnus Hagander wrote: > > >>> Attached patch adds a version check for bison when running the > > vc++ > > >>> build. > > >> > > >> Shouldn't it be looking for 2.1 as well? > > > > > 2.1 is the broken one. > > > > Exactly. So we should reject it. > > We do. The code as-is *only* accepts 1.875. Thus it rejects 2.1.
I think Tom's point is that we should reject only 2.1. Isn't that the only version that fails? -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match