On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 16:48 -0500, Gregory Stark wrote: > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Attached is the current state of my work on generalizing operator classes > > into "operator families", as per discussion last week. It's far from > > ready to apply, but I thought I'd circulate it for comments. What's done > > is ... > > > Comments? > > Didn't we say discussion should happen on -hackers so development progress > would be more visible?
I thought it did? Tom's marked this clearly as WIP. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
