Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Patch applied. Thanks. > >>> I added a comment about the unused bits in the header file. > >> Has anyone bothered to measure the overhead added by having to mask to > >> fetch or store the natts value? This is not a zero-cost improvement. > > > > SHOW ALL has: > > > > log_temp_files | -1 | Log > > the use of temporary files larger than th > > > > and pg_settings has: > > > > log_temp_files | -1 | kB | Reporting and Logging / What to Log > > > > Looks OK to me. > > What? I'm completely lost here. What does log_temp_files have to do with > the bits on the tuple header?
Sorry, Tom wanted two things tested and I replied to the wrong email. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
