Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > bool > ! isort(int4 *a, int len) > { > bool > ! isort(int4 *a, const int len) > {
If VC thinks that that is required to fix a warning, it's too broken to live. AFAICS what you've got there is a compiler that is being pedantically strict about language details that it does not actually understand well; its apparent idea that "const **" means "const * const *" being much in the same line as this one. I don't mind the non-const-related parts of this patch, but I recommend rejecting all the const-decoration changes. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match