Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> Tom Lane wrote: > >>> BTW, I don't care much for the terminology "phantom cid" ... there's > >>> nothing particularly "phantom" about them, seeing they get onto disk. > >>> Can anyone think of a better name? The best I can do offhand is > >>> "merged cid" or "cid pair", which aren't inspiring. > >> > >> MultiCid, like the MultiXacts? Maybe not, they're quite different beasts... > > > Dual cid? Double cid? > > "Double cid" doesn't sound too bad. Another thought that just came to > mind is "cid interval" or some variant of that.
I don't like "double ctid" because it is really just one ctid, but represents two. I am thinking "packed ctid" is the right wording. It doesn't have the same impact as "phantom", but it is probably better. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
