On 2/17/07, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. Would you have a look at the tests as they are now and confirm that that's what you wanted?
Yes, the tests in HEAD right now are what I wanted. Although, while I was in there I did notice a minor thing (another copy-paste error): the timestamptz test is using a column alias that's not consistent with other tests in the vicinity. Patch attached.
iso_regress_fix.patch
Description: Binary data
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
