Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What are *you* thinking? Yes, that patch has that line, but > log_statement and log_min_duration_statement is going to trigger > log_min_error_statement so you are going to get the statement printed > twice.
What's wrong with that? If a statement triggers two different log entries, and both are subject to being annotated with the statement text according to log_min_error_statement, I would expect them both to be annotated. Doing otherwise will probably break automated log analysis tools. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly