"Gregory Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Is there a newer version of this patch? > > As requested, I've cut an updated version of this patch against CVS HEAD: > > http://community.enterprisedb.com/sort-limit-v5.patch.gz
Someone asked why I've been posting links rather than attachments. The only reason was because when I posted patches in the past they were dropped by the mailing list. I would say "refused" except I never received a bounce, the messages just never appeared on list or in the archive. I'll try attaching this patch again, which is relatively small compared to the recursive query patches and packed varlena patches which disappeared into the ether. Also, this one is gzipped whereas in the past I usually attached patches uncompressed so people could read them without saving and uncompressing them. Perhaps one of those differences is the source of the problem? Do people prefer receiving attachments or downloadable links? Does the answer change if the patches are quite large?
sort-limit-v5.patch.gz
Description: Binary data
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
