Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Uh, no, that's not very clear. A long-running transaction will be a > >> VACUUM bottleneck because of its own XID, never mind its xmin. > > > Well, my secondary addition was to start MyProc->xmin with the current > > xid counter, rather than your own xid. > > Don't tell me you seriously believe that would work.
I do. Please tell me why it will not. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
