Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> So are you stopping work on the patch? I assume so. > > > >> Yes, at least for now. I can't believe the patch actually hurts > >> performance, but I'm not going to spend time investigating it. > > > > Are we withdrawing the patch from consideration for 8.3 then? > > I had assumed it was still a live candidate, but if it seems to > > lose in pgbench maybe we had better set it aside. > > I haven't tried pgbench, the tests I ran were with DBT-2. > > Just to summarize again: the patch did help to keep the stock table > smaller, but the response times were higher with the patch. > > Maybe we should keep this issue open until we resolve the vacuum WAL > flush issue? I can then rerun the same tests to see if this patch is a > win after that.
Would you like to add a TODO item? -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
