Dave Page wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Dave Page wrote: > >> Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> Simon Riggs wrote: > >>>> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice > >>>> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm > >>>> not sure what the problem is? > >>>> > >>>> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00 > >>>> Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00 > >>> What an obvious ploy to get more time for development. ;-) > >> In a bid to stave off such accusations, Simon had a couple of us witness > >> the outgoing mail in his Sent Items folder. We can arrange for copies of > >> our notarized statements to be provided if necessary :-p > > > > Well, FAST posted emails dated April 4 a few days ago, proving email > > dates are not a valid method of authenticating the "sent" date. Perhaps > > FAST's post-dated emails were meant to throw us off of Simon's pre-dating > > them. ;-) > > > > Darn, busted! After all that lobbying for a short release cycle we had > to conspire with FAST to extend it again ;-)
Yep, I suspected a conspiracy from the start. ;-) -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend