Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> That doesn't mean this one isn't useful. Please revert this.
> Well, Tom and I thought it caused confusion, as did the person reporting > the confusion. You saying to revert it isn't enough. A possible compromise is to describe or show the syntax in some informal form, so that it didn't look like one of the <synopsis> sections we use for supported syntax. I'm not sure what that would look like exactly, but I do see merit in both sides of this discussion... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match