"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * I'm a bit concerned about dump order. If a user wants to create > types named "foo" and "_foo", he can, but it will only work if he > makes "_foo" first --- else the derived type for foo is in the way. > Since pg_dump has no clue about that constraint, it might easily > dump "foo" first leading to an unrestorable dump. The most usable > solution would be to auto-rename previously created array types, > but I dunno how implementable that would be.
BTW, why exactly do we need array types to have names at all? The only user-visible way to refer to these types is always by foo[] isn't it? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
