Neil Conway wrote: > On Mon, 2007-14-05 at 16:22 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I agree with Tom. I don't think the current behavior is a major issue > > for users for it to be mentioned more than it already is > > Are you really suggesting that we shouldn't modify config.sgml to note > that "autovacuum = off" does not actually imply that "the autovacuum > daemon is disabled"? ISTM that plainly violates the principle of least > surprise -- it is almost the definition of what an entry in config.sgml > *should* include.
I agree, the note should be added there (but it should be a short one and refer the reader someplace else for more complete details). Was there a doc patch proposed already? I seem to have missed it. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
